As more retailers turn to chatbots to enhance the shopping experience, the way consumers interact with these digital assistants—whether through voice or text—significantly impacts their decision-making process and overall satisfaction.
A recent study examined how different communication methods—speaking versus writing—affect consumer decision-making and satisfaction with retail conversational agents. The study looks at factors like product type (hedonic vs. utilitarian) and brand equity. Using LIWC, the researchers conducted five experiments to understand how matching the communication method with the product type can influence consumer choices and satisfaction.
The study explored how speaking or writing affects consumer preferences and satisfaction by changing how consumers express their thoughts. It also investigated if speaking or writing with retail conversational agents impacts product evaluation differently depending on whether the product is primarily hedonic (pleasure-oriented) or utilitarian (function-oriented). The results revealed that speaking generally increased preference for low-equity brands in hedonic contexts, while writing was more effective for utilitarian products. This suggests that aligning the communication method with the product type can significantly affect consumer choice and satisfaction.
First experiment:
Participants who spoke about hedonic products (like perfumes) were more likely to choose these products compared to when they wrote about them. On the other hand, writing about utilitarian products (such as printers) led to more thoughtful and rational decisions, improving satisfaction with their choices. This indicates that the emotional engagement of speaking is better suited for hedonic items, while writing's analytical nature benefits utilitarian products.
Second experiment:
Focused on food choices and found that speaking led to the selection of unhealthier options, whereas writing encouraged healthier choices. This highlights that writing can be particularly effective in promoting better dietary decisions, offering valuable insights for the food industry.
Third experiment:
Explored how allowing consumers to choose their preferred communication method affected their satisfaction. Participants who chose their mode of interaction and matched it with the product type were more satisfied with their decisions. This suggests that giving consumers the option to choose between speaking and writing can enhance their satisfaction, especially when the choice aligns with the product type.
Fourth experiment:
Examined how communication modality affects decision-making during real-time online interactions. It was found that matching the modality to the product type—speaking for hedonic and writing for utilitarian—improved satisfaction. This implies that businesses should design their conversational interfaces to align with the product's nature to boost consumer satisfaction and decision-making efficiency.
Fifth experiment:
Investigated how modality matching impacts low- versus high-equity brands. It showed that low-equity brands benefit more from aligning their communication method with the product type compared to high-equity brands. For instance, a lesser-known brand selling a hedonic product would see a greater increase in choice likelihood if consumers interacted via speaking rather than writing. This suggests that low-equity brands should strategically use communication methods to enhance their appeal and compete effectively.
Overall, the study provides valuable insights for businesses on designing conversational agents and interaction strategies that align with product types and brand positioning.
Key takeaways to improve retail chatbots:
Product Type Alignment:
Consumers make better choices and feel more satisfied when the communication method matches the product type. Speaking works better for hedonic products (like perfumes), which evoke emotional responses, while writing suits utilitarian products (like printers), which require rational decision-making. Marketers should tailor their communication strategies accordingly.
Healthier Choices:
Writing interactions lead to healthier food choices compared to speaking. This is useful for food retailers and brands aiming to promote healthier eating. Integrating text-based interactions into apps or online platforms can help guide consumers toward better dietary decisions.
Consumer Self-Selection:
Allowing consumers to choose their preferred communication method enhances satisfaction, especially when it aligns with the product type. Offering options for both speaking and writing can improve the consumer experience and satisfaction with the purchasing process.
Low-Equity Brand Strategy:
Low-equity brands can benefit significantly from matching their communication method with the product type, compared to high-equity brands. This strategic use of modality can boost the competitive edge of less-known brands.
Practical Implementation:
Marketers can use these insights to design their conversational agents and customer interactions. Implementing voice-based agents for hedonic products and text-based agents for utilitarian products can lead to better engagement and decision-making. Additionally, offering flexible communication options and focusing on product type alignment can enhance choice satisfaction and effectiveness in marketing.
By incorporating these strategies, marketing strategists can create more targeted, effective campaigns that resonate with consumers, improve consumer satisfaction, and more effectively position their brands in the market.
It's easy to learn about people's psychology from their language. Get to know more about LIWC and other psycholinguistic frameworks like the Big Five, DISC, and Fast and Slow Thinking.
Comments